Auction Agreement

The seller may have a minimum price that he is willing to accept for the property. After the sale, bidders offer competing amounts, bids, and the seller accepts the highest bid. The sale can be made by the seller or through an agent designated as an auctioneer. For example, in Zendman v. Harry Winston, Inc., 305 N.Y. 180 (N.Y. 1953), the applicant, appealed a decision of the Supreme Court`s Appeal Division in the First Judicial Department (New York) in a case concerning the auction of jewelry without the owner`s consent. The complainant bought a ring at an auction. The defendant, a diamond dealer, claimed ownership of the ring.

The gallery that auctioned the ring did so in error, without the accused`s permission. The court dismissed a judgment of the declaration, but rendered a judgment to the applicant on the defendant`s counter-action concerning Mr. Relevin. The Court of Appeal was set aside. The court quashed and found that the defendant according to N.J. Stat. Ann. No. 46:30-29 is excluded from the principle of Estoppel`s assertion that the gallery is not authorized to sell the ring to the applicant.

The complainant was an innocent buyer (bona fide buyer) and there was nothing to notice them that the title of the gallery could be questionable. In addition, the accused was aware of the ring`s display in the gallery, but did nothing to inform the public that it was not for sale immediately. Such sales procedures were also in normal activity between the defendant and the gallery. The Tribunal set aside that decision on the basis that the defendant was prevented, by the Estoppel principle, from arguing that the gallery did not have the power to sell the ring to the applicant. The complainant was an innocent buyer and there was nothing to notice them that the title of the gallery could be questionable. When the auction takes place in person, the incense will issue a voice or gesture signal indicating the acceptance of each auction. Finally, no higher offer is offered and the auction ends for this item. When the auction is over, the seller cannot refuse the sale of the item for the highest amount of the bid. Nor can the buyer refuse to pay the price. For example, at Sohns v. Beavis, 200 N.Y. 268 (N.Y.

1911), the defendant seller issued an order from the Supreme Court`s Appeal Division in the First Judicial Department (New York), quashing a judgment in favour of the accused after the buyer dismissed the complaint by the court and granted a new trial. The buyer purchased real estate at an auction. The Court of Appeal found that this sale of land, because it was carried out in haste and confusion, was not governed by the strict rules applicable to formal contracts for the sale of real estate.


Please signup or login to answer this question.